An Introduction to Tripartite Relativity


Andrew Hennessey, born in Edinburgh, Scotland, began investigating relativity and holism in the late 1970’s and by 1991 had formulated many of the concepts of Tripartite Essentialism or TRE.
Andrew draws parallels to Nikola Tesla’s ‘Theory of Environmental Energy’ circa 1900 and also to the Logical Atomism of Bertrand Russell also circa 1900.

TRE is both a physical and metaphysical General Systems Theory that is based in Chaos Theory and flux, the natural order of the physical cosmos, and it is also a metaphysics that maps out logically every exchange within and between objects within this cosmic flux at all scales and magnitudes.
This metaphysics, rooted in Logical Atomism (Russell and Wittgenstein, circa 1910), is programmable.


The physical theory is aether-based and assumes absolute chaos and contends as in finger-prints, that universally in physical chaos no two objects are identical at any scale.
Similar objects belong to a classification of similar behaviours of similar objects with similar properties. The criteria for attributing an object to a set of similarly behaving but physically different objects is then socially agreed upon.

The physical theory of TRE – and its particle physics (Harmonic Continuum Theory) models a solution to the quantum paradox – the collapsing wave paradox.
It also predicts that there is no basic ‘identical’ building block or ‘God particle’ because objects in chaos and aether are infinitely divisible.
We just don’t have the scientific apparatus to look deep enough for smaller and smaller particle events.
Also the TRE physics predicts that there is no absolute ‘Big Bang’ and ‘Big Crunch’ and that because of the Chaos law of ‘Emergence’ there will be no ‘heat death’ because Emergence and its process of reconstruction counteracts the Entropy of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

The physical theory also predicts that atoms and particles organically mutate and that free energy comes from the chaos law of ‘emergence’ as adjacent dimensions constantly push new harmonically structured turbulence events (sub-atomic particles) into this reality that then become constrained in size by local densities.

It predicted in 2003, now verified that black holes could create and eject new stars. Probably because adjacent connecting dimensions are capable of chaotically altering the density of their aethers and thereby occasionally reversing their flow where they connect at the black hole.

It also predicts that time is a field-effect of mass and that it is equivalent to gravity. Further TRE predicts that time is non-linear, that the speed of light is not a constant, but a local phenomena, and that Planck’s constant – the alleged fixed distance between shells in a particle is also only local behaviour and not universal.
Indeed TRE would assert that there are no universal constants , just locally mutating phenomena recognised to be within certain parameters with certain equipment in a certain time frame.
TRE particle theory has all particles from the smallest sub-atomic at all scales as constrained to produce internal structure and be guided in size by activity and pressure within the local cosmic aether.

At this moment in time in the 21st Century, there is every indication from published scientific results that there is a detailed and significant correlation between the physical theory of TRE and the TRE metaphysical process descriptions, and that as a general systems theory – the unity of physics and metaphysics proposed is not based on the arbitrary.


With everything in the absolutely chaotic universe in a state of flux, the most basic, atomic and logical model of an exchange is between A and B through some common C with the intercession in natural chaos of at least some D.
The three dimensional universe of chaos and flux is absolutely comprised of such atomic and logical exchanges.

The Tripartite Essentialism, TRE, model of the physical universe attributes a series of limited (essentialist) numbers to events taking place between and within objects.
The essentialist TRE numbers themselves however are then further related to empirical measurements and Scientific units of measure that delineate the scale and activity of energies, transactions and events within the physical context of each object in flux.
A TRE number therefore has information both about the integrity of transactions and also about the physical scale, behaviour and nature of the context of the object it relates to.
TRE numbers on their own therefore are merely Boolean Arithmetic pertaining to a generic logical exchange ABC, but it is the addition of empirical data that creates the specific picture of an objects behaviour and performance.

There are only 8 logical ways to describe the integrity of an object or system involved in an ABC exchange at time 1, and at time 2 there are in total 64 logical outcomes that depict the integrity of any ABC exchange, because the 8 versions at time 1 can be one from any other of the 8 at time 2.  (8 times 8 = 64) This is Language [T]
By introducing natural chaos and modality into the exchange process, Language [A] there are then a total of 27 state descriptions that describe every possible variation of the integrity of an exchange between two objects ABC at time 1.  This set of 27 state descriptions includes the 8 logically real ones of [T], at time 1, but adds a further set of 19 logical (transitional) modalities. Hence at time 2 in an ABCD exchange 27 times 27 produces 729 state descriptions of any exchange in the universe at time 2.
This limited and closed set of essentialist arithmetic with 729 (or also 64) components produces a finite number for infinity which enables advanced computation to circumvent the Halting Problem (Turing, Church).

The closed and limited set of essentialist numbers in TRE ie. (64 or 729) that enumerate every possible description of the integrity of an exchange between A and B through some common C, means that there is a finite measuring stick, a scale of relationships upon which to base intelligent computation.
A computational system utilising a TRE numbering strategy would overcome the Halting paradox which currently prevents functional Artificially Intelligent computing.
It is currently only AI computers that utilise an infinity of object labels that are favoured by public domain industry.
As these machines cannot process infinite possibilities they fail to find the significance of the endless labels they are processing and cannot resolve issues.
A TRE computer though is not working with an infinity of object labels but a finite and limited set of transactions within all objects – it has no halting problem. A TRE computer is working not with labels but with the elements of objects in the same way that the infinity of the physical cosmos and its endless diversity can be described by the finite number of elements in a periodic table of chemistry.

For every and any event therefore there is an ABC exchange with the intercession of some D. This logical fact is the most basic component of any exchange in the cosmos and we can say of any ABC(D) exchange that at any time1,  part A is integrated and contributing, or disintegrated and not contributing, or doing neither – basically 1 or 0 or A
The same for part B and part C of the ABC(D) exchange between two objects.

What part A, B and C refer to is decided by the observer who supplies the context and empirical values of the exchange being observed.
There are many ways that any object or event could be described or observed in the universe in terms of the ABC exchanges it uses in both its internal and external structure, but it is the observer who gives context for event modelling and the physical criteria of the observations.

A logical programming language similar to PROLOG called HX Assembler was developed to enable computer modelling and mapping of the physical cosmos, objects and their environments, with TRE metaphysics.
This metaphysics and modelling can enable accurate data exchange between very different maps and hence solve a major problem in Artificial Intelligence. That is TRE provides ‘isomorphism between domains’ – a process that would enable an artificially intelligent machine to use analogies from other kinds of knowledge to solve unknowns in a different problem area.

This Tripartite model at the heart of every object at any scale in the cosmos was further developed into a general systems description that could be universally applied to every object.
This is called 6 Keys Systems Theory and with this basic atomic model, every object in the cosmos could be divided into nested zones and its intricacies modelled for computing purposes.

TRE although an R&D project does overcome the major paradoxes at the heart of Robotics; namely the ‘Halting problem’ (Turing, Church) and also Goedel’s ‘Logical numbering incompleteness paradox’
TRE therefore in a fully developed state would be at the heart of a major industrial revolution in Information Technology.

For the purposes of computation there is a way to represent Knowledge about every Universal object in a Tripartite format of the kind;

  1. OBJECT, MACRO (Context measurements and ingredients)
  2. PROCESS, MESO (internal structure)
  3. QUALITY, MICRO (outcome or asset)

By giving every object in our Knowledge Representation database three attributes like these we can start to create a scientific picture about the performance of objects for computation purposes.
This three part system also maps onto our use of natural language where; Object is a Noun, Process is a Verb and Quality is an Adjective.
By using data gathering strategies like these it is possible to map and model with lots of non-TRE data which would ultimately boost TRE project outcomes.

TRE technology – based on its closed set of essentialist arithmetic could be the basis for a myriad of StarTrek technologies including; teleportation, scanning, long range cosmic travel, matter transmutation and executive robotics.


Popular posts from this blog

Transhumanism and the Galaxy

The Falkirk Triangle

The New Star Party vision 30 years ago - still cutting edge ?