An Introduction to Tripartite Relativity
AN INTRODUCTION TO TRIPARTITE RELATIVITY - TRE
Andrew Hennessey, born in Edinburgh, Scotland, began
investigating relativity and holism in the late 1970’s and by 1991 had
formulated many of the concepts of Tripartite Essentialism or TRE.
Andrew draws parallels to
Nikola Tesla’s ‘Theory of Environmental Energy’ circa 1900 and also to the
Logical Atomism of Bertrand Russell also circa 1900.
TRE is both a physical
and metaphysical General Systems Theory that is based in Chaos Theory and flux,
the natural order of the physical cosmos, and it is also a metaphysics that
maps out logically every exchange within and between objects within this cosmic
flux at all scales and magnitudes.
This metaphysics, rooted
in Logical Atomism (Russell and Wittgenstein, circa 1910), is programmable.
1. THE PHYSICAL THEORY
The physical theory is
aether-based and assumes absolute chaos and contends as in finger-prints, that
universally in physical chaos no two objects are identical at any scale.
Similar objects belong to
a classification of similar behaviours of similar objects with similar
properties. The criteria for attributing an object to a set of similarly
behaving but physically different objects is then socially agreed upon.
The physical theory of
TRE – and its particle physics (Harmonic Continuum Theory) models a solution to
the quantum paradox – the collapsing wave paradox.
It also predicts that
there is no basic ‘identical’ building block or ‘God particle’ because objects
in chaos and aether are infinitely divisible.
We just don’t have the
scientific apparatus to look deep enough for smaller and smaller particle
events.
Also the TRE physics
predicts that there is no absolute ‘Big Bang’ and ‘Big Crunch’ and that because
of the Chaos law of ‘Emergence’ there will be no ‘heat death’ because Emergence
and its process of reconstruction counteracts the Entropy of the Second Law of
Thermodynamics.
The physical theory also
predicts that atoms and particles organically mutate and that free energy comes
from the chaos law of ‘emergence’ as adjacent dimensions constantly push new
harmonically structured turbulence events (sub-atomic particles) into this
reality that then become constrained in size by local densities.
It predicted in 2003, now
verified that black holes could create and eject new stars. Probably because
adjacent connecting dimensions are capable of chaotically altering the density
of their aethers and thereby occasionally reversing their flow where they
connect at the black hole.
It also predicts that
time is a field-effect of mass and that it is equivalent to gravity. Further
TRE predicts that time is non-linear, that the speed of light is not a
constant, but a local phenomena, and that Planck’s constant – the alleged fixed
distance between shells in a particle is also only local behaviour and not
universal.
Indeed TRE would assert
that there are no universal constants , just locally mutating phenomena
recognised to be within certain parameters with certain equipment in a certain
time frame.
TRE particle theory has all
particles from the smallest sub-atomic at all scales as constrained to produce
internal structure and be guided in size by activity and pressure within the
local cosmic aether.
At this moment in time in
the 21st Century, there is every indication from published
scientific results that there is a detailed and significant correlation between
the physical theory of TRE and the TRE metaphysical process descriptions, and
that as a general systems theory – the unity of physics and metaphysics
proposed is not based on the arbitrary.
2. THE PROGRAMMABLE
METAPHYSICS MODEL
With everything in the
absolutely chaotic universe in a state of flux, the most basic, atomic and
logical model of an exchange is between A and B through some common C with the
intercession in natural chaos of at least some D.
The three dimensional
universe of chaos and flux is absolutely comprised of such atomic and logical
exchanges.
The Tripartite
Essentialism, TRE, model of the physical universe attributes a series of
limited (essentialist) numbers to events taking place between and within
objects.
The essentialist TRE numbers themselves however are then
further related to empirical measurements and Scientific units of measure that
delineate the scale and activity of energies, transactions and events within
the physical context of each object in flux.
A TRE number therefore
has information both about the integrity of transactions and also about the
physical scale, behaviour and nature of the context of the object it relates
to.
TRE numbers on their own
therefore are merely Boolean Arithmetic pertaining to a generic logical
exchange ABC, but it is the addition of empirical data that creates the
specific picture of an objects behaviour and performance.
There are only 8 logical
ways to describe the integrity of an object or system involved in an ABC
exchange at time 1, and at time 2 there are in total 64 logical outcomes that
depict the integrity of any ABC exchange, because the 8 versions at time 1 can
be one from any other of the 8 at time 2.
(8 times 8 = 64) This is Language [T]
By introducing natural
chaos and modality into the exchange process, Language [A] there are then a
total of 27 state descriptions that describe every possible variation of the
integrity of an exchange between two objects ABC at time 1. This set of 27 state descriptions includes
the 8 logically real ones of [T], at time 1, but adds a further set of 19
logical (transitional) modalities. Hence at time 2 in an ABCD exchange 27 times
27 produces 729 state descriptions of any exchange in the universe at time 2.
This limited and closed
set of essentialist arithmetic with 729 (or also 64) components produces a
finite number for infinity which enables advanced computation to circumvent the
Halting Problem (Turing, Church).
The closed and limited
set of essentialist numbers in TRE ie. (64 or 729) that enumerate every
possible description of the integrity of an exchange between A and B through
some common C, means that there is a finite measuring stick, a scale of
relationships upon which to base intelligent computation.
A computational system utilising a TRE numbering strategy
would overcome the Halting paradox which currently prevents functional
Artificially Intelligent computing.
It is currently only AI
computers that utilise an infinity of object labels that are favoured by public
domain industry.
As these machines cannot
process infinite possibilities they fail to find the significance of the
endless labels they are processing and cannot resolve issues.
A TRE computer though is
not working with an infinity of object labels but a finite and limited set of
transactions within all objects – it has no halting problem. A TRE computer is
working not with labels but with the elements of objects in the same way that
the infinity of the physical cosmos and its endless diversity can be described
by the finite number of elements in a periodic table of chemistry.
For every and any event therefore there is an ABC exchange
with the intercession of some D. This logical fact is the most basic component
of any exchange in the cosmos and we can say of any ABC(D) exchange that at any
time1, part A is integrated and
contributing, or disintegrated and not contributing, or doing neither –
basically 1 or 0 or A
The same for part B and
part C of the ABC(D) exchange between two objects.
What part A, B and C
refer to is decided by the observer who supplies the context and empirical
values of the exchange being observed.
There are many ways that
any object or event could be described or observed in the universe in terms of
the ABC exchanges it uses in both its internal and external structure, but it
is the observer who gives context for event modelling and the physical criteria
of the observations.
A logical programming
language similar to PROLOG called HX Assembler was developed to enable computer
modelling and mapping of the physical cosmos, objects and their environments,
with TRE metaphysics.
This metaphysics and
modelling can enable accurate data exchange between very different maps and
hence solve a major problem in Artificial Intelligence. That is TRE provides
‘isomorphism between domains’ – a process that would enable an artificially
intelligent machine to use analogies from other kinds of knowledge to solve
unknowns in a different problem area.
This Tripartite model at
the heart of every object at any scale in the cosmos was further developed into
a general systems description that could be universally applied to every
object.
This is called 6 Keys
Systems Theory and with this basic atomic model, every object in the cosmos
could be divided into nested zones and its intricacies modelled for computing
purposes.
TRE although an R&D
project does overcome the major paradoxes at the heart of Robotics; namely the
‘Halting problem’ (Turing, Church) and also Goedel’s ‘Logical numbering
incompleteness paradox’
TRE therefore in a fully
developed state would be at the heart of a major industrial revolution in
Information Technology.
For the purposes of
computation there is a way to represent Knowledge about every Universal object
in a Tripartite format of the kind;
- OBJECT, MACRO (Context measurements and ingredients)
- PROCESS, MESO (internal structure)
- QUALITY, MICRO (outcome or asset)
By giving every object in
our Knowledge Representation database three attributes like these we can start
to create a scientific picture about the performance of objects for computation
purposes.
This three part system
also maps onto our use of natural language where; Object is a Noun, Process is
a Verb and Quality is an Adjective.
By using data gathering
strategies like these it is possible to map and model with lots of non-TRE data
which would ultimately boost TRE project outcomes.
TRE technology – based on
its closed set of essentialist arithmetic could be the basis for a myriad of
StarTrek technologies including; teleportation, scanning, long range cosmic
travel, matter transmutation and executive robotics.
Comments